The Supreme Court ruled Monday that law enforcement’s use of a geofence warrant to obtain cellphone location data constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, marking a significant privacy ruling ...
2d
Every phone leaves a trail — Supreme Court holds location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment
Jason McCullough and Brandon Moss of Wiley Rein LLP examine the Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States, which ...
On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Chatrie v. United States, holding in a 6-3 decision that law ...
Kagan insists that the Fourth Amendment cannot be defeated by slicing invasions of privacy into pieces small enough to appear insignificant.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Chatrie v. United States extends Fourth Amendment protection to geofence location data ...
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court rendered obsolete the 4th Amendment’s prohibition on suspicionless seizures by the police. When the court stayed the district court’s decision in Noem vs. Vasquez ...
Geofence warrants compel tech companies like Google to provide information about electronic devices that are present in a given area on a particular date during a specific window ...
Find the latest Fourth Amendment news from WIRED. See related science and technology articles, photos, slideshows and videos.
Suppose the police want to get illegal drugs off the streets. So they begin stopping pedestrians at gunpoint, shoving them against walls, frisking them, and searching their belongings. They also force ...
Listen to “Flock or the Fourth Amendment? Huntington Chose Poorly” on Spreaker. Huntington City Council voted 6-4 early ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results