In Cunningham v. Cornell University, 1 the Supreme Court unanimously held that plaintiffs who bring a prohibited transaction claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ...
The federal judge wants the plaintiffs in the ERISA case to spell out their factual case before discovery begins.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision regarding the proper pleading standard for prohibited transaction claims brought under the Employee ...
The plaintiffs in Cunningham v. Cornell University were a group of current and former Cornell University employees who participated in two defined-contribution retirement plans from 2010 to 2016. In ...
A case brought in 2016 against Cornell University will be reviewed for how strictly the courts should read ERISA on transactions between plan sponsors and service providers. The U.S. Supreme Court has ...
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision in Cunningham v. Cornell University has altered the litigation landscape for benefit plan fiduciaries and their insurers. Understanding those changes ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback